Hi Shava - Congrats to you and SPF on crossing the 100 project mark!
I’m curious to hear what others have to say, but in an ideal world, everyone is working on things that are interesting and fulfilling to them, and the work is spread relatively evenly, right?
But there are obviously real-world constraints that SPF and all other sponsors face — and there are an infinite number of ways to approach this.
Have you ever looked at organizing your projects based on the approximate amount of work they generate for your staff / how much attention they require? That’s probably where I would start.
I also know that some parks foundations in other cities group their projects by geography and assign out a different region to each liaison.
You could also combine those two — for example, if you had 15 really large/complex projects, maybe those get grouped together for one of your more experienced liaisons. Then, the other 90 get sorted regionally and assigned that way.
Whether or not any of this makes sense really depends on the make-up of your portfolio — have you all done any work looking at natural ways to categorize your projects for this purpose?